← dashboard

ncrp

model: opus-4-8 cpp static analysis on 0 PR(s) seen
workspaceninjarmm jira projectNJ review targetsmain · master · develop · release/* · *_release thresholdsseverity ≥ minor · confidence ≥ medium · cap 12 max diff0.4 MB pollevery 300s

What this is

NCRP server component — the relay/server side that NinjaRemote peers connect through for session establishment and data relay. C++/Qt.

Project primer

Durable orientation injected into every review as .ai-review/project.md.

ncrp — NCRP relay / rendezvous server (review primer)

An internet-facing Qt/C++ rendezvous + relay server for NinjaRemote: peers connect,
it authenticates and pairs the two sides of a session, then relays their encrypted PeerData
byte-for-byte (it does NOT decrypt session payload). Also handles a UDP NAT-traversal path.

Architecture (durable map)

(sharded thread-per-worker).

session they are paired and the server relays packets between them.

the digest/auth algorithm live there and are cross-repo.

What matters most when reviewing here (durable risk areas)

BEFORE session authentication; the digest/token check is all that stands between an anonymous
connection and session association. This is the highest-scrutiny code.

while session state is ref-counted — a disconnect race is a real use-after-free risk. Any
change to pairing/teardown needs careful lifetime reasoning.

exhaustion under load/abuse — no unbounded growth; clean teardown on every error path.

constraint must survive protocol changes.

Security-sensitive zones

The pre-auth handshake parser + session digest/token verification; the DUT UDP path; the relay
pairing logic (mixing up peers = cross-session data leak).

Compatibility surfaces (contracts that must not silently break)

common/**; client and server run at different versions, so changes must stay compatible.

Conventions & gotchas

never add logging that dumps relayed content.

_Orientation only — verify current specifics in the code; this describes durable architecture &
risk areas, not a snapshot._

Ecosystem map

Shared cross-project relationships, injected as .ai-review/ecosystem.md.

NinjaRemote / NinjaOne project ecosystem (relationship map)

How the monitored repos relate — so a change in one repo is reviewed with its blast
radius in mind (a change upstream of ncpeer can break ncpeer even if it looks local).
Orientation only; verify specifics in code.

NinjaRemote product

speak the NCRP wire protocol (protocol/format changes must stay compatible across
client and server versions).

Cloud-side relays of the ninja-remote system (AWS-hosted, Python/Go)

URLs, it pairs them and forwards frames verbatim. Signed join URLs are minted by the
Ninja backend — the signature scheme is a backend⇄relay contract, and the frame
semantics are a peer⇄peer contract.

a signed upload leg streams to a signed download leg through memory (never stored).
Two parallel implementations (Python ftsv2/ + Go fts_go/) must stay behaviorally
identical; the URL/signature scheme is shared-family with websocket-switch.
NinjaRemote file-transfer features ride on these relays when peers can't go direct.

Pulled INTO ncpeer (and sometimes nmsnj) — upstream of the products

or behaviour change here affects both consumers.

build against**. A dependency bump changes what those products link (security/ABI/build).

through the ncpeer_vcpkg overlay.

Largely independent

shares nccommon and ncpeer_vcpkg with ncpeer.

part of the remote-desktop family). Runs as a child process of the NinjaRMM agent (the
parent owns install/upgrade/policy/launch); NinjaFlow owns the CLI contract, config schema,
credential precedence, DB schema/migrations, and exit-code meanings the parent consumes
those are cross-process contracts. Submits telemetry to the Ninja Backend. Shares no code with
ncpeer/nmsnj; adjacent to nmsnj only in domain (network), not in implementation.

not part of any product's build. It consumes the SBOMs the other products' pipelines emit
(Ninja-Remote/ncpeer, NMS/nmsnj, NinjaFlow all appear in its scope maps), scans them for CVEs
and files Jira issues — a downstream *security-scanning* relationship, not a code dependency.
Shares no code with the others; has its own DB/schema and a toolbox submodule.

authentication component: its pam_ninja.so gates SSH reverse-tunnel access into
Ninja infrastructure with a time-based OTP. Shares no code with the other repos; its
blast radius is operational (who can SSH-tunnel into hosts), not code-level. The client OTP
generators and the module must agree on the OTP scheme + shared secret.

Review implications

these are *upstream* of ncpeer (and nccommon/vcpkg also of nmsnj) — weigh the consumer
side: API/ABI compatibility, build impact, and cross-platform reach.

contract.

Also in every review's context

The reviewer instructions CLAUDE.md (rules, house C++ style, output schema); the PR/ticket block pr.md (title, description, linked Jira + acceptance criteria, commits, changed files); the full diff.patch; and deterministic static_analysis.md (cppcheck on changed lines).